How to use the consent order builder
- Choose the kind of order. A consent order puts the agreed terms in the court’s order; a Tomlin order stays the claim on terms in a schedule or a separate agreement.
- Enter the claim. The court, the claim number and the parties, as on the claim form, and whether there is a counterclaim.
- Say who signs. Each party’s solicitors, or that a party acts in person, and whether a child or protected party is involved or the court must approve the order.
- Enter the agreed terms. In the parties’ own words, one paragraph a line, and tick what they do so the builder can say whether a court officer can seal the order.
- Choose the costs clause. Pick one standard wording from the fixed list: costs assessed on the standard or indemnity basis if not agreed, fixed costs, no order, each side its own, or costs dealt with in the Tomlin terms.
- Check and download. Read the checks, preview the order, download it as a Word document, and have it signed for each party before it is filed with the fee.
Tomlin order or consent order?
Both record a settlement and both are made “by consent”. The difference is where the agreed terms sit, and so how they are enforced. The parties choose: incorporate the terms in the body of the order, so they are part of the court’s order, or seek a stay of the claim on terms that they will comply with the agreement in the schedule, with liberty to apply to enforce it (Community Care North East v Durham at [25]).
| Consent order | Tomlin order | |
|---|---|---|
| Where the terms are | In the order itself | In a schedule, or a separate agreement; the order stays the claim |
| If a term is broken | Enforce the order directly, with no further proceedings (Vanden v Kras at [47]) | Apply in the same claim under the permission to apply; the court decides then on the terms (Zenith v Coury at [61]) |
| Terms outside the claim | The relief must be within the relief claimed (Chancery Guide, para 16.34) | Can include terms the court could not order (Zenith v Coury at [48]; Chancery Guide, para 16.35) |
| Privacy | A non-party can usually obtain a copy of the order (CPR 5.4C(1)(b)) | An attached schedule too (Zenith v Coury at [59]); a dated agreement referred to but not attached stays private (at [64]–[66]) |
| Changing it later | The parties’ agreement weighs heavily against any variation (Community Care North East at [27]) | The scheduled terms change only as a contract can, for example by rectification (Community Care North East at [28], [34]–[36]) |
| Costs | The costs clause is part of the order | Any order for the payment and assessment of costs goes in the body, not the schedule (PD 40B para 3.5) |
Calling an order a Tomlin order does not make it one: an order that stays the claim but contains the terms of settlement as orders is a consent order (Vanden v Kras at [47]–[48]), and a consent order to pay a sum in settlement of a claim is treated as a judgment, so satisfying it can bar a claim against another party liable for the same damage (at [49]–[50]). An undertaking to the court can be enforced without a further application, so an order containing one is a consent order too (Zenith v Coury at [70]).
What every consent order needs
Where all the parties agree the terms of a judgment or order (CPR 40.6(1)), the order (CPR 40.6(7); PD 40B para 3.4):
- must be drawn up in the terms agreed;
- must be expressed as being “By Consent”; and
- must be signed by the legal representative acting for each of the parties to whom it relates or, where it goes to a judge, by a party who acts in person.
A consent order sealed by a court officer need not state the name of a judge (CPR 40.2(1)(c)), and the parties draw it up (CPR 40.3(1)(d)). Where the parties have agreed the amount of costs, the order for costs must state that it is by consent (PD 44 para 9.10). An order that requires an act other than paying money must say when it is to be done (PD 40B para 8.1).
Court officer or judge?
A court officer may enter and seal an agreed judgment or order if (CPR 40.6(2)):
- it is listed in CPR 40.6(3): payment of money or delivery up of goods; dismissal of the proceedings; a stay of the proceedings on agreed terms disposing of them, whether the terms are in a schedule or elsewhere; a stay of enforcement, or payment by instalments; setting aside an unsatisfied default judgment under Part 13; payment out of money in court; discharge of a party from liability; and the payment, assessment or waiver of costs, or such other provision for costs as may be agreed;
- none of the parties is a litigant in person; and
- the court’s approval is not required by the rules, a practice direction or an enactment.
Otherwise, any party may apply for an order in the agreed terms (CPR 40.6(5)): file an application notice with the draft order, drawn so that the judge’s name and judicial title can be inserted (PD 40B para 3.3), using the free N244 builder if you wish. The court may deal with it without a hearing (CPR 40.6(6)), and a court officer who finds a consent order unclear or incorrect may refer it to a judge (PD 40B para 3.2). The builder tells you which applies; an order that also vacates a hearing is, on our reading, not on the list.
In the Commercial Court and the Circuit Commercial Courts, CPR 40.6 does not apply: an application for a consent order must include a draft of the proposed order signed on behalf of all the parties to whom it relates (CPR 58.15(2), (3); 59.12(2), (3)), and a judge deals with it. Tick the box in the builder and it says so.
The costs clause: the standard wordings
The builder offers only these wordings, with the parties and the scope filled in. It never puts a figure on costs: where the amount is not agreed, it is assessed. Each wording is read the way the free costs order decoder reads it.
- One side pays the other’s costs, assessed on the standard basis if not agreed. “The Defendant shall pay the Claimant’s costs of the claim, to be subject to detailed assessment on the standard basis if not agreed.” Detailed assessment under Part 47 if the amount is not agreed, on the standard basis (CPR 44.3(2), 44.6(1)(c)).
- One side pays the other’s costs, assessed on the indemnity basis if not agreed. “The Defendant shall pay the Claimant’s costs of the claim, to be subject to detailed assessment on the indemnity basis if not agreed.” As above, but doubts are resolved in the receiving party’s favour, and the proportionality test, which applies only on the standard basis, does not apply (CPR 44.3(2)(a), (3)).
- One side pays the other’s fixed costs under Part 45. “The Defendant shall pay the Claimant’s costs of the claim, such costs to be the fixed costs and disbursements allowed by Part 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules, together with VAT where appropriate.” For a claim where Part 45 fixes the costs: says so expressly, so the order is not read as agreeing assessed costs (Doyle v M&D Foundations at [44], [55]). VAT may be recovered on top, where appropriate (CPR 45.2).
- No order as to costs. “There shall be no order as to costs.” Each party bears its own costs (PD 44 para 4.2).
- Each party bears its own costs. “Each party shall bear its own costs of the claim.” The same effect as no order as to costs (PD 44 para 4.2).
- Costs are dealt with in the agreed terms (Tomlin only). “There shall be no order as to costs, the parties having agreed in the Schedule to this Order how the costs are to be dealt with.” No order for costs: the agreement deals with them as a contract term, not an order of the court (Community Care North East v Durham at [26], [28]). A direction for the payment and assessment of costs should be in the body of the order, not the agreed terms (PD 40B para 3.5(2)).
Two optional additions go with an order to pay costs: payment within 14 days of agreement or of the final costs certificate, which is a date the court specifies under CPR 44.7(1)(c), and a date from which interest on the costs runs, which the court can order under CPR 44.2(6)(g) and 40.8(2). The interest clause sets only the start date: interest then runs at the rate for judgment debts where one applies (Judgments Act 1838 s.17; in the County Court only on orders of £5,000 or more), and a different agreed rate goes in the terms in the parties’ own words (our reading). Without these additions, the costs are payable within 14 days of the certificate (CPR 44.7(1)(b)) and interest, where interest is payable on it at all, runs from the date of the order (CPR 40.8(1)). As a general rule, an order that does not mention costs leaves no party entitled to costs in relation to it (CPR 44.10(1)), so the builder always asks for a clause. A payment on account of costs (CPR 44.2(8)) needs a figure, so it is not on the menu: if the parties agreed one, record it in the agreed terms in their own words.
In a fixed recoverable costs claim, an agreed order for costs “subject to detailed assessment if not agreed” has been held to mean assessment under Part 47 on the standard basis, displacing fixed costs (Doyle v M&D Foundations at [44], [51], [56]), unless the context shows otherwise, as where the order records the acceptance of a Part 36 offer (at [53]–[56]); if the parties agreed fixed costs, the Part 45 wording says so, with VAT on top where appropriate (CPR 45.2), and if the amount is not agreed, the receiving party applies for a fixed costs determination on Precedent U, decided on paper (CPR 45.64). In a personal injury claim, an order for costs against the claimant is subject to qualified one-way costs shifting (CPR 44.14). Earlier orders matter too: costs reserved become costs in the case if nothing later deals with them (PD 44 para 4.2), so make sure the agreed terms say what happens to each.
Tomlin orders: what goes in the order itself
Where the parties draw up a consent order staying the proceedings on agreed terms recorded in a schedule, any direction for payment of money out of court, or for payment and assessment of costs, should be in the body of the order, not the schedule (PD 40B para 3.5). The builder puts the costs clause in the body and flags a schedule that tries to deal with assessment or money in court. The body also carries the two parts that do the work: the stay, and each party’s permission to apply to enforce the terms without a new claim (Zenith v Coury at [61]). On our reading, a Tomlin order should not also dismiss or discontinue the claim, because the stay is what keeps the claim alive for an application to enforce.
In the Chancery lists of the Business and Property Courts the Chancery Guide also asks that a Tomlin order be headed “Tomlin Order”, that confidential terms are not filed but identified by date and where they are held, that the order names the party who will serve it and ends with a service note (paras 16.21 to 16.23), and that a signed PDF and a clean Word version without the signature blocks are filed (Chancery Guide 2022, paras 16.36 to 16.42). The builder adds the service note when you tick the Chancery box. The court does not normally inspect the settlement terms and takes no responsibility for them (para 16.43).
Children and protected parties
Where a claim is made by or against a child or protected party, no settlement, compromise or payment, and no acceptance of money paid into court, is valid so far as it relates to that claim without the court’s approval (CPR 21.10(1)). The application must include a draft consent order, details of liability, the party’s age and occupation, the litigation friend’s approval, the expert evidence and, except in very clear cases, a legal opinion on the merits (CPR 21.10(3)). If the claim has not been issued, the approval claim is made under Part 8 (CPR 21.10(2)). The court directs how the money is dealt with (CPR 21.11), and costs payable by or out of the money of a child or protected party normally go to detailed assessment (CPR 46.4(2)). The builder stops when you tick that a child or protected party is involved. To fill in the certificate of suitability for a litigation friend, use the free N235 builder.
The court fee
Schedule 1 to the Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008 does not name consent orders or Tomlin orders. A consent order is asked for by an application by consent, so on our reading the fee is £126 (fee 2.5(a)), the fee for an application by consent or without notice where no other fee is specified. An application by consent for a payment out of funds deposited in court is £63 (fee 2.5(b)); where the order also does other things, which fee applies is our reading. See them with every other fee by form and step in the free civil court fees calculator.
After the order: assessment and payment
Under an order to pay costs “to be assessed if not agreed”, either party can ask for a costs certificate in an agreed amount (CPR 47.10); if the costs are not agreed, detailed assessment proceedings are started within 3 months of the order (CPR 47.7) with a notice of commencement and the bill: fill in the notice with the free N252 builder, see every date with the detailed assessment deadline calculator, and work out the interest with the interest on costs calculator.
Related guides and tools
- The terms, defined: detailed assessment, the standard basis, the indemnity basis and costs-only proceedings
- What a costs order means, and who pays: the costs order decoder
- Breach of settlement in housing disrepair claims: Tomlin orders and further costs
- CPR 46.14 costs-only proceedings: when to issue Part 8
Sources
- CPR Part 40 (rules 40.2, 40.3, 40.6 and 40.8) and Practice Direction 40B (paras 3.1 to 3.5 and 8.1)
- CPR Part 21 (rules 21.10 and 21.11)
- CPR Part 44 (rules 44.2(6)(g) and (8), 44.3, 44.6, 44.7, 44.10, 44.14 and 44.17) and Practice Direction 44 (paras 4.2 and 9.10)
- CPR Part 46 (rules 46.4 and 46.14) and CPR Part 47 (rules 47.7 and 47.10)
- CPR Part 45 (rules 45.2 and 45.64)
- CPR Part 5 (rule 5.4C)
- CPR Part 58 (rule 58.15) and CPR Part 59 (rule 59.12)
- Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008, Schedule 1 (fees 2.5(a) and 2.5(b))
- Chancery Guide 2022 (fifth update, September 2025), paras 16.20 to 16.23 and 16.34 to 16.43
- Community Care North East v Durham County Council [2010] EWHC 959 (QB)
- Vanden Recycling Ltd v Kras Recycling BV [2017] EWCA Civ 354
- Zenith Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Coury [2020] EWHC 774 (QB)
- Doyle v M&D Foundations & Building Services Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 927